In any pipeline system, gate valves act as silent guardians, ensuring the safe and reliable control of fluid flow. However, like all mechanical components, gate valves are subject to wear, corrosion, and stress over time. Ignoring the early warning signs can lead to energy loss, operational inefficiencies, or even critical safety hazards. This guide walks you through the most common signs of gate valve failure and helps you decide when it’s time for repair—or complete replacement.
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit MetalsKingdom.
If fluid continues to leak after the valve is closed, or if pressure readings keep dropping, it’s a clear sign something’s wrong. This often points to damage on the sealing surface—either from aging rubber seals or worn metal seats. Even small leaks can result in substantial fluid loss over time. In sectors like chemical processing, leaks can also mean environmental hazards or regulatory issues.
Note: Leakage may seem minor, but if it’s accompanied by difficult operation or erratic performance, the valve could be nearing full failure.
If operating the valve requires excessive force—or if you hear grinding, squeaking, or scraping during movement—internal mechanical issues are likely. Common causes include:
Much like forcing a rusted door hinge, this can accelerate damage and may even cause the valve stem to break.
Tip: Difficult operation is not just inconvenient—it may indicate imminent mechanical breakdown.
Visible rust, deep corrosion near flanges, or a hollow “thud” when tapped may point to serious metal degradation. This is especially common in underground valves exposed to moisture and soil over time. If the wall thickness of the valve body has reduced by more than 20% from its design spec, even without a current leak, it has likely lost its pressure-bearing capacity.
Conclusion: At this stage, repair is often not viable. Full replacement is strongly recommended.
Sometimes, valve failure doesn’t look dramatic. You might notice:
These subtle signs mean the valve is no longer effectively controlling the process. Abrasive or particulate-laden fluids can accelerate wear, and if ignored, may result in dangerous system failure—as documented in several industrial incidents.
Tip: Combine pressure tests with other observations to get a full picture of valve condition.
Excessive vibration or rhythmic banging noises while the valve is in service could mean internal parts—such as the gate—have come loose. In large-diameter valves, this can cause damaging resonance and stress to the entire pipeline. There are documented cases where ignoring valve vibrations led to catastrophic pipeline ruptures and service outages.
Gate valves are essential components of critical infrastructure. Timely inspection, regular testing, and prompt response to warning signs can prevent costly downtime or serious accidents. If you’re unsure about the condition of your valve, consult a certified valve technician or contact us for professional evaluation.
As a professional valve manufacturer, TFW Valve has a dedicated technical team ready to provide expert assessments and tailored solutions to ensure the safe and reliable operation of your pipeline system. If you are looking for a trusted gate valve manufacturer, TFW Valve is your ideal choice.
The realization of safe and smooth operations of industrial processes is heavily reliant on valves performing their function with precision. Thus, valve testing ensures that these valves meet design specifications for the duration of their operational life.
Generally, valve testing simulates operating conditions in a controlled environment to ensure fit for service valves. However, testing also occurs periodically after installation in line with standard practices.
In this article, we will review common valve testing types and industry standards that offer guidelines for valve testing.
There are several types of testing to which a valve could undergo. The required test depends on the application, manufacturer standards, and customer specifications. The following sections examine common tests, an overview of their procedure, and industry guidelines.
This test involves filling a valve body with a testing fluid, which is usually water with a corrosion inhibitor. Then, technicians apply pressure over a specific period of time. The time and level of pressure varies depending on factors including the valve material, valve size, and category of pressure test. But in most cases, the pressure level is higher than the operational/working pressure of the valve. Also, the procedure for the pressure test varies depending on the type of valve in question. Generally, pressure tests aim to ascertain the integrity of the valve shell, seat, and seal against leakages due to pressure. After carrying out a test, a valve will not be accepted if the following occurs:
Common industry guidelines for pressure testing valves can be found in ASME B16.34, API 598, MSS-SP-61, API 527, and ISO . Many tests are recorded on paper wheel charts or manually, although digital options are becoming more prevalent.
For more information, please visit pipe beveling machinery.
Although water (hydrostatic) is the most common test medium in pressure testing, some conditions require pneumatic pressure testing of valves. For pneumatic testing, air or an inert gas such as nitrogen are the preferred media. Generally, in industry, hydrostatic testing is ideal for high-pressure applications where the equipment is not moisture sensitive.
In situations where moisture can damage certain equipment – usually via corrosion – or alter the chemical balance in the system, pneumatic testing is recommended. Also, industry guidelines recommend the use of pneumatic testing for cryogenic and low temperature valves. This is because it is difficult to remove all water after the test. The presence of moisture in an operating system is highly discouraged. The table below highlights more of the differences between hydrostatic and pneumatic testing in line with standards and industry practices.
Note: Testing above 100 psi gas pressure can be very dangerous due to the expansion properties of a gas.
When pressure testing a valve, there are key components that are given a closer look for the duration of the process. Three of these include the shell, seal, and seat.
Want more information on gate valve tester? Feel free to contact us.
The valve shell refers to the main body of the device. Moreover, its testing in the industry is driven mostly by guidelines from API 598 and ASME B16.34. Typically, the valve is mounted on a test bench and partially opened. Then, the shell is pressurized, with ASME B16.34 recommending a minimum of 1.5 times the valve pressure rating at 100 ℉ (38 ℃) for hydrostatic testing. While that of pneumatic seat testing is 1.1 times the maximum allowable pressure. Pneumatic testing is done to 80-100 psi. Also, both the API and ASME standards recommend varying test duration depending on the size of the valve being tested. The table below summarizes the test duration.
In addition, the test water temperature should range between 41 ℉ (5 ℃) and 122 ℉ (50 ℃). And the pressure gauge used for measurements should have calibration ranging from not less than 1.5 times the test pressure, to not more than 4 times the test pressure. For a valve shell to pass the test, there shall be no visible leakage for the duration of the test.
A valve stem seal (packing) is also monitored during the shell test. For adjustable stem seals, the occurrence of leakage during the test is NOT a cause for rejection, as long as the manufacturer can demonstrate the seal’s capacity to retain at least the maximum allowable pressure of the valve without any visible leakage. Adjustments to the packing are allowed to eliminate leakage. For non-adjustable stem seals, no leakage is permitted during the shell test.
Typically, the valve seat test is carried out after testing the valve shell. With the same API and ASME standards as with the shell test providing guidance. The recommended pressure is 110% of the maximum allowable pressure at 100 ℉ (38 ℃), and the test time varies with size in accordance with ASME B16.34.
The test duration recommendations from API 598 are similar to these, and it also states the allowable leakage rates from the seat.
For valve sizes greater than 14 inches, the hydrostatic test leakage rate should not exceed two drops per minute per inch. While the pneumatic test leakage rate should be less than four bubbles per minute per inch.
One of the requirements of industrial valves is having reliable fire protection. This holds particularly true for sensitive applications such as oil and gas, refinery, and petrochemical industries. Moreover, valves in these industries must guarantee a reliable and safe shut-off in case of a fire incident.
In a fire test, a valve is pressurized and subject to high-temperature flames between ℉ (750 ℃) and ℉ ( ℃) for a period of thirty minutes. During this period, the heat intensity and the leakages – both internal and external – are monitored and measured. Also, after extinguishing the flames and allowing the valve to cool, the technician test its pressure-retaining capacity. All through the test, the leakage levels should be within acceptable limits for the valve to pass as being “fire-safe”. Some key things to note about fire testing include:
Standards such as API 607, API 6FA, ISO , BS , and BS constitute industry guidelines for fire testing. On the basis of these guidelines, several companies set up their bespoke procedure for fire-safety valves. Of all the fire testing guidelines, API 607 and API 6FA are the most widely used. API 607 provides testing criteria for valves with non-metallic seating and quarter-turn valves. API 6FA provides the testing criteria for metal seated valves.
Note: Most metal-to-metal seated Gates, Globes, and Swing checks are NOT tested to API 607 due to their inherently Fire Safe Design. (There are no soft parts to melt during a fire.)
A fugitive emissions test aims to assess the impact of gas or vapor leakage from a valve. Although this leakage can be from anywhere along the piping system, statistics show that approximately 60% of fugitive emissions stem from valves. This data highlights the importance of this test. In addition, the impact of these emissions has significant consequences including:
When carrying out fugitive emission tests, the most common test gases are helium and methane. The valve is pressurized with the test gas at varying temperatures. Then technicians monitor for leakages via the sniffing or vacuum method. International standards such as API 622, API 624, API 644, ISO -1, and ISO -2 all provide guidance on how to carry out this valve test. However, most organizations develop their specifications to ensure application suitability.
Cryogenic testing of valves is done for those operating at low temperatures or in cryogenic service. The test procedure involves placing the valve within an insulated tank, with liquid nitrogen at temperatures of down to -320 ℉ (-196 ℃).
Then, helium pressurizes the valve to the operating pressure specified for its class. During the test, technicians closely monitor the temperature inside the valve and leakages. In the end, the valve is depressurized and warmed up until it attains ambient temperature. Thereafter, a detailed report summarizes the performance of the valve and whether leakages were within acceptable limits. There are several international standards that provide guidelines for cryogenic valve testing including ISO -1, ISO -2, EN , and BS .
In addition to the standards mentioned in the previous section, there are a host of standards that provide recommendations for different valve types and test procedures. The table below provides a list of these standards and the areas of testing they cover, for quick referencing.