When to Use Seamless and Welded Pipe - Eng-Tips

11 Aug.,2025

 

When to Use Seamless and Welded Pipe - Eng-Tips

LittleInch

Petroleum
Joined
Mar 27,
23,143
Location
GB
What design code?

How corrosive?
With what?
Size and wt affect availability. Above about 16 to 20" seamless gets hard to find

This is more of a material selection issue and I don't know if any pipeline code which will tell you this. B31.3 doesn't like welded pipe for some reason and applies a factor on wall thickness

There is a lot of preferential engineering here and different companies have different views.

There should be little difference but you may need to look at the impact of the seam weld on corrosion issues.

If you have sour service (H2S) then seamless is definitely preferred, which is a material selection issue under the NACE standards.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it. Upvote 0 Downvote

SmallInfo

Petroleum
Joined
Oct 30,
104
Location
PK
LittleInch,
Its H2S rich
b31.8
8" size
Client will ask why I am selecting seamless or welded.
Thanks for reply Upvote 0 Downvote

LittleInch

Petroleum
Joined
Mar 27,
23,143
Location
GB
You need to ask a materials engineer, but I'm pretty sure for sour service you need seamless if possible and 8" the cost is about the same.

It's all about the hardness of the weld. Also look in your sour service specification.

Design wise in 31.8 it makes no difference and they won't guide you as it is not something B31.8 does.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it. Upvote 0 Downvote

TiCl4

Chemical
Joined
May 1,
643
Location
CA
A general rule for corrosive services is that seamless piping is preferred - ERW pipe tends to be attacked along the pipe-weld bondline at a higher corrosion rate than the base material. My impression (not fact!) is that mill tolerances for wall thickness are either higher for seamless pipe over ERW pipe or that they are harder to get within tolerance (more expensive). So if you need to do branch reinforcement calculations for larger diameters or higher T&P, the mill tolerance becomes important.

Piping codes don't generally tell you what pipe to use in a given application; there are generally too many factors and special cases, so they leave the application up to the user.
Upvote 0 Downvote

EdStainless

Materials
Joined
May 20,
16,404
Location
Waukesha WI USA
Seamless will have much more variation in wall than welded.
Seamless also usually has a rougher ID surface.
In ERW steel pipe there can be selective HAZ corrosion attack because it isn't full body heat treated after welding.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed Upvote 0 Downvote

weldstan

Materials
Joined
Jun 24,
2,816
Location
US
For your application choose seamless due to answers provided above. Due to our global supply chain and the vast differences in ERW welding methods from mill to mill and quality thereof, a greater chance of failure is incurred using ERW. ERW pipe can be made with excellent properties but you really have to know the mill's capabilities. Upvote 0 Downvote

MJCronin

Mechanical
Joined
Apr 9,
5,102
Location
US
My two cents ...
[ul]
[li]No piping code or standard will tell you when to use more expensive seamless piping and when not to[/li]
[/ul]
[ul]
[li] Are you selecting schedule 80 pipe for this corrosive service ? Having a thicker wall will make the piping last longer[/li]
[/ul]

[ul]
[li]Some B31 series piping codes have a higher allowable stress for seamless piping ..Seamless pipe can withstand 10-20% more working pressure than welded ones of the same material grade and size.. On what basis was your pipe wall thickness calculated ?[/li]

[/ul]


MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer Upvote 0 Downvote

TiCl4

Chemical
Joined
May 1,
643
Location
CA
MJCronin,

When would the MAWP of the piping become the deciding factor for a piping system's thickness at low temperature and pressure? In my mind, required thickness is often very low at low T&P, and other factors like maximum unsupported span and extra thickness for corrosion allowance tend to dominate. Typically pressure is also limited by the flanges or connectors rather than piping, is it not?

I'm not challenging you here, but rather curious as to where you've seen or heard of the extra MAWP of the seamless pipe being important in the selection of ERW vs seamless. Upvote 0 Downvote

SmallInfo

Petroleum
Joined
Oct 30,
104
Location
PK
Littleinch, TiCI4, Edstainless, Weldstan, MJCronin
Thank you so much for your valuable time and information you shared, now its clear to me.
Thanks again you all Upvote 0 Downvote

EdStainless

Materials
Joined
May 20,
16,404
Location
Waukesha WI USA
At thicker walls the seamless premium is not very much more expensive.
Many ASME codes do derate welded tube by 15% for no reason other than it was welded.
The seamless tube will always be heavier and the thinnest spot will be thinner than with welded tube.
The greater wall variation is just a fact of life.


= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed Upvote 0 Downvote

r

Mechanical
Joined
Jan 12,
3,053
Location
AR
For 10-15 years choose the cheapest.

Regards Upvote 0 Downvote

Petroleum
Joined
Jun 25,
3,464
Location
PT
Each great project company in oil industry have its own basic engineering specs based on standaed codes, I am afraid you won´t recieve the wright answer here.

REGARDS Upvote 0 Downvote

Daren Samy

Mechanical
Joined
Oct 6,
59
Location
PK
Use seamless pipe. ERW pipe is not recommended in severe conditions. Welded point is weak points and it is at risk of failure

Daren! Upvote 0 Downvote

dik

Structural
Joined
Apr 13,
26,153
Location
CA

... but informative, nonetheless.

-----*****-----
So strange to see the singularity approaching while the entire planet is rapidly turning into a hellscape. -John Coates

-Dik
Upvote 0 Downvote

Petroleum
Joined
Jun 25,
3,464
Location
PT
Seamless steel pipe is better than welded pipe. Seamless steel pipe is limited in larged diameters up to 24". Upvote 0 Downvote

r

Mechanical
Joined
Jan 12,
3,053
Location
AR
@
You are wrong.
See SA-106
1.1 This specifcation covers seamless carbon steel pipe
for high-temperature service (Note 1) in NPS 1/8 to NPS 48
[DN 6 to DN ] (Note 2) inclusive, with nominal (aver
age) wall thickness as given in ASME B36.10M

Regards Upvote 0 Downvote

Petroleum
Joined
Jun 25,
3,464
Location
PT
r
you're right, I was speaking generally. But the use of welded pipe and seamless pipe depends on the intended service. If it is going to be used for a lethal dangerous, high pressure or corrosive service I would use seamless pipe, if it is going to be used in an enoquo service I would use the cheapest welded pipe. Upvote 0 Downvote

EdStainless

Materials
Joined
May 20,
16,404
Location
Waukesha WI USA
Seamless pipe isn't better than welded, it just has different types of defects in it.
With welded you get very uniform surface finish inside and out along with very uniform wall thickness.
The type of welding will dictate the nature of weld imperfections that you should be testing for, and the HT method (local to weld or full body) will influence the final properties of the pipe.
Seamless pipe will always have very significant wall thickness variation (commonly over +/-10% in each length) and the ID surfaces can have significant variation in surface.
Tears and cracks on the ID surface are not uncommon in seamless product.
Seamless over ~24" OD is usually forged hollows made in short lengths.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed Upvote 0 Downvote

How API 5L Pipe Alternatives Can Save Money - T Bailey Inc

API 5L is a robust seamless and welded steel pipe specified by the American Petroleum Institute and designed for use in pipeline transportation systems. This steel pipe is optimized for transporting petroleum and natural gas and is subjected to rigorous hydrostatic, NDE, and destructive testing to ensure it can withstand internal pressures.

Click here to get more.

Despite these specifications, it’s common for API 5L to be used for casing, pipe piling, and other structural applications.

But considering that API 5L isn’t designed to be used as casing, is it really the best pipe for the job?

The answer is almost always no.

API 5L and the Difference Between Transportation and Structural Pipe

The American Petroleum Institute designed 5L pipe to be a transportation vehicle. They took into consideration all the requirements of their industry and designed the API 5L steel pipe to meet those requirements.

So what do those requirements look like and what is the difference between transportation pipe and structural pipe?

Internal vs. External Stress

The biggest difference between transportation pipe (API 5L) and structural pipe (like casing) is that the primary stresses are different.

With pressure vessels and transportation pipeline (which are just another kind of pressure vessel), the primary stress is internal. The liquid load that the pipe is transporting is putting internal stress on the longitudinal seams and body of the pipe.

Consequently, the longitudinal seams of transportation pipe are optimized and subjected to more severe testing than the longitudinal seams of structural pipe.

Casing, on the other hand, is a structural pipe application, so it is designed to withstand external stress. Since the stress is external, the primary stresses are being exerted against the circumferential seams.

For example, think of the conditions that casing is used in. It needs to be optimized for the compression, sideways tension, and vertical thrusting tension caused by forces like wind, sea pressure, and seismic activity.

All of these forces are putting external stress on the circumferential seams, which, again, is not the kind of stress that API 5L is optimized for.

Quality Control Requirements That Make API 5L Pipe an Expensive Choice for Casing

In one sense, pipe is pipe, so yes, API 5L can function as casing, but it’s not an optimal choice because:

  1. It’s not designed to be used as structural pipe.
  2. It comes with a number of quality control requirements that can drastically increase the cost of your project.

Since API 5L’s specification is for line pipe, it requires testing for internal pressure. This level of testing is not necessary for casing, as structural pipe only needs to be tested for external pressures — water, wind, sea pressures, earthquakes, etc.

The internal pressure quality control specified for API 5L includes hydrostatic testing, nondestructive, and destructive testing.

Zongrun Product Page

Hydrostatic Testing

A hydrostatic test is a way in which pressure retaining equipment can be safely tested for strength and leaks. Hydrostatic testing isn’t just about ensuring that the welds are secure, its main purpose is to test the material’s workmanship. It physically tests every square inch of the pipe to ensure that it can withstand internal pressures.

NDE

Radiographic Testing & Ultrasonic Testing – commonly known as RT and UT – is required on 100% of the welded seams, both longitudinal and circumferential. These tests ensure that 100% of the welds are free of defects.

Destructive Testing

Destructive testing is a group of analysis techniques used for evaluating the properties of the materials, components or welds where a sample of the product is tested to determine the point of failure. It requires the manufacturer to cut out a portion of the product and send it to a laboratory for analysis. Destructive testing is used to determine the material’s performance against internal pressures.

API 5L Casing Alternatives

Casing and pipe piling are products that will be filled or encased with concrete after installation, so it is not necessary to perform the hydrostatic leak test, and 100% NDE or destructive testing is usually considered an unnecessary expense considering the uses of the product in this application.

Just as you wouldn’t use water pipe for transporting oil (because it’s optimized for water-carrying by lining it with special coatings or concrete), so too you shouldn’t use oil pipe for casing.

When clients come to T BAILEY LLC requesting API 5L for a casing project, we recommend considering these two alternatives:

ASTM A252

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) “A252, Standard Specification for Welded and Seamless Steel Pipe Piles” is sufficient for most casing projects.

This is a standard that T BAILEY LLC uses when no other specification is provided in the request for quote. Many Department of Transportation projects use this pipe specification.

ASTM A252 has 100% visual inspection requirements and dimension checks, and is the most cost-effective alternative to API 5L.

API 2B (Non-monogrammed)

“API 2B Specification for the Fabrication of Structural Steel Pipe” is similar to ASTM A252. However, API 2B has more quality control performed on the welded seams, including 100% Visual inspection, 100% RT or UT of the circumferential seams, and 10% RT or UT of the longitudinal seams. This makes API 2B a much better fit for casing and pipe piling projects.

In addition, there are supplemental requirements that can be added to ensure further engineered requirements are met.

Note: There are only a few manufacturers in the United States that provide monogrammed material. Keep in mind you can specify the pipe to meet the requirements of API 2B but not be monogrammed, which will substantially increase the number of qualified manufacturers who can provide materials for your project. If you are requesting pipe from a reputable fabricator, they will ensure you are getting the correct product to meet your project requirements.

Checklist: Is API 5L the Best Steel Pipe for Your Project?

If you’re still not sure if API 5L is the best pipe for your project, answering the following questions can help set you on the right track:

  • Is the pipe for a structural application like casing or piling?
  • Are you going to use it for pile caps?
  • Will the pipe be filled with concrete or another solid material?
  • Is hydrostatic testing unnecessary?

If you answered “yes” to any of these three questions, then you should skip API 5L and choose either API 2B or ASTM A252 for your project.

Get Your API 5L Questions Answered

Choosing the right steel pipe for your project is crucial and can drastically impact your budget. To ensure that you choose the ideal pipe for your casing or pipe piling project, contact T BAILEY LLC today.

If you are looking for more details, kindly visit api 5l seamless pipe.