Four Bar Linkage Knee Analysis | O&P Virtual Library

28, Jul. 2025

 

Four Bar Linkage Knee Analysis | O&P Virtual Library

View as PDF

If you are looking for more details, kindly visit our website.

with original layout

Four Bar Linkage Knee Analysis

Michael P. Greene, B.S., M.E., C.P.O. *

INTRODUCTION

Modern prosthetists have a wide selection of prosthetic knees to fulfill many individual specifications. The names "friction," "safety," "lock," "hydraulic," etc. quickly recall particular classes of single axis knees. For these single axis knees, the name (friction, safety, etc.) simply states a unique feature which defines the major mechanical advantage of that class of knees.

Polycentric knees, however, may present the prosthetist with confusion. This confusion results from the fact that the term "polycentric" does not define any specific function. Secondly, these knees require more than a simple knowledge of mechanics to fully understand their functions.

This paper will examine one category of polycentric knees which are known as "four bar linkages." Simple methods for evaluating these knees will be presented. These evaluating methods will enable the prosthetist to determine the major mechanical or cosmetic advantage of most four bar designs. The prosthetist will also learn comparative methods of evaluating the efficiency of a particular four bar design in attaining its specific mechanical or cosmetic goals. This skill is extremely important since each four bar design is unique in its operation. Specifically, each four bar knee has been designed to enhance individual characteristics such as safety, cosmesis, energy conservation and/or swing phase motion.

DEFINITION OF TERMS

  1.  Translation or translational motion is the movement of a machine element along a straight line.
  2.  Rotation or rotational motion is the movement of one element of a mechanism about a pivot point.
  3.  Center of Rotation is the point about which rotational motion occurs. This may be an actual mechanical pivot point on the mechanism or a purely hypothetical point which may or may not actually be on the mechanism.
  4.  Single Axis Knee—Any knee in which the shin moves in pure rotation about a constant center of rotation located at the knee bolt.
  5.  Polycentric Knee—Any knee whose design allows the shin to move in a combination of rotational and translational motion. At any given instant of time, this combination can be mechanically described as a purely rotational motion about a constantly changing center or rotation known as the instantaneous center of rotation.
  6.  Instantaneous Center of Rotation (or Instant Center)—The point about which a particular element (shin) may be assumed to be moving in pure rotation at any given instant of motion being analyzed. For a single axis knee this will be a constant point at the knee bolt center. For a polycentric knee this will be a theoretical point in the plane of motion (sagittal plane).
  7.  Four Bar Linkage Knee—A specific class of polycentric knees. The knees are characterized by four elements joined at four separate points. The four elements include the thigh, shin and two links. (Note: In actual practice, a single link may be a pair of parallel links acting together. However, for mechanical purposes these pairs are considered as single links.)

Fig. 1A is a typical four bar linkage knee. The thigh is considered as a link or bar joining points B and E. This link is defined BE. The shin is considered as a link joining points C and D. This link is called CD. Link BC and ED join the shin to the thigh. Together, all four links join at four points to complete the four bar linkage. Fig. 1B is a kinematic schematic representation of the knee seen in Fig. 1A which shows this typical link arrangement.

STABILITY IN STANCE PHASE OF A FOUR BAR LINKAGE KNEE

Alpha (a) Stability—At this point it is assumed that the reader understands the basic theory of the T.K.A. (Trochanter-Knee-Ankle) line and the accepted T.K.A. alignment method of simple single axis knee mechanisms. In this method the knee is made more stable (safer) by moving the knee center posterior to the T.A. (Trochanter-Ankle) line. Conversely, moving the knee center anterior to the T.A. line decreases weight bearing stability.

Stability of a four bar knee system is also determined by using the T.K.A. theory. The knee center becomes the theoretical "instantaneous center of rotation" in this case. This point must be determined for each position of the knee which is in question.

For static (bench) alignment purposes, the accepted knee position is that of full extension. With the knee fully extended the instantaneous center for rotation is determined by drawing a line through each of the two links joining the shin to the thigh (see Fig. 1A ). The instantaneous center of rotation (point O) is the point where these two lines intersect. The stability of the system is determined by noting the position of this instant center in relation to the T.A. line. As in the single axis knee, the center of rotation must be posterior to the T.A. line to be considered as a stable weight bearing system.

At this point the reader's understanding of the "instantaneous center of rotation" and of four bar knee motion may be unclear; this confusion can be eliminated if one understands that a four bar knee is mechanically equivalent to a particular hypothetical single axis knee at any instant of motion being analyzed. This hypothetical knee has its knee bolt located at the instant center of the equivalent four bar knee. Fig. 1C gives the single axis equivalent of the four bar knee depicted in Fig. 1A (at the full extension position only). Therefore, the motion and mechanical reaction of the four bar knee in Fig. 1A is precisely identical to that of the single axis knee seen in Fig. 1C at this position of extension. Often it is easier to understand the reaction of the four bar if one visualizes this instantaneous single axis equivalent rather than the actual four bar mechanism.

Since the instant center of a four bar is changing through each position of flexion, the equivalent single axis knee will also be different for each position of flexion. Therefore, care must be taken to analyze the four bar mechanism at the exact angular position which is in question.

A simple method of estimating the instantaneous center of rotation of an actual four bar knee mechanism would be to lay two straightedges along the links and note the point of intersection. A third straightedge could be aligned with the trochanter and ankle center to simulate the T.A. line. Stability of the system is estimated by measuring the distance from the T.A. line to the instant center. For the sake of this discussion, this distance will be defined as "a" (alpha). A positive a value is defined as a knee center which is posterior to the T.A. line. This is a stable or "positive a stability" condition. A negative a value indicates an unstable system with the knee center anterior to the T.A. line.

At this point it is interesting to compare a prosthesis with a single axis knee to the four bar knee prosthesis seen in Fig. 1A . The single axis knee has an a = 0 value at full extension. As it begins to flex, a becomes negative and progressively more unstable as flexion continues. The special four bar knee in Fig. 1A has a positive a value at full extension. As flexion begins, the value becomes smaller but it remains positive for the first few degrees of flexion. Obviously, this knee was designed to have enchanced stance stability and therefore could accurately be called a "four bar safety knee."

Beta (B) Stability—A second and unique condition affecting knee stability exists with all four bar knee mechanisms. Referring to Fig. 1A, it is noted that the instantaneous center of rotation is superior to the level of the mechanical (or cosmetic) knee center (point Kc). With this prosthetic knee the patient gains a mechanical advantage over a typical single axis knee. This mechanical advantage is gained in two ways as a result of raising the instant center.

Fig. 2A is a free body diagram of a typical above knee prosthetic shin shortly after heel strike. The force L is the axial component of load applied at the knee bolt by the thigh section. The force E is the force applied to extend the knee mechanism. This force is also applied by the thigh at the knee bolt. Forces Rv and Rh are the vertical and horizontal components of the floor reaction force. To analyze this situation, moments are summed to equal zero about the point "f" to yield the equation: Equation 1

It is noted that if the knee center is raised, the value of "y" and of L will remain unchanged. However, the value of "h" will increase and for the above equation to balance; the value of E will proportionately decrease. This simply means that the moment tending to cause knee buckling is reduced and therefore the patient uses less force, E, to hold the knee in extension.

The second way in which knee stability is increased by raising the knee center is demonstrated in Fig. 2B . This represents a typical above knee prosthetic thigh. Force W and I are the loads applied to socket by the patient, (note: W and I are assumed to act on a point along the T.K.A. for this analysis. L' is the axial component of reaction force applied by the shin at the knee bolt (L" = -L). E" is the force applied by the shin tendng to buckle the knee (E" = — E). H is the extension force applied by the residual limb to hold the knee in extension. x2 is the effective lever arm of the residual limb. To analyze this situation, moments are summed about the point "t" to equal zero: Equation 2

It is noted that if the knee center is raised, the value of x2 would remain constant. This condition would also decrease the value of E (reduce buckling force as seen above) and thus reduce the values of E' and H proportionately. It is also observed that Xj would decreasejn value creating a second way in which H would be proportionately decreased. This second advantage can also be described as increased leverage for the residual limb.

In summary, raising the knee center reduced the knee buckling moment and increases the patients leverage advantage in controlling that moment. With single axis knees these advantages would only be available by sacrificing the cosmetic appearance of bending at the anatomical knee center. This is not the case with a four bar knee mechanism. The four bar knee can give the cosmetic appearance of bending at the proper anatomical height while providing the added stability of a proximal instantaneous knee center. Fig. 1A depicts a typical four bar knee prosthesis and its anatomic (or cosmetic) knee center, Kc ¦ /3 (beta) is the vertical difference between the anatomical knee height and the instantaneous knee center at full extension. The B value (or "B stability") gives a relative value of stability for comparing four bar mechanisms to each other and to single axis knees. B is measured positive if the instantaneous knee center is above the anatomic knee center, and conversely negative if this instant center is lower than the anatomical center.

The simple method outlined previously for determining the instant center will also yield stability. By determining these values the prosthetist now has a guage for selecting a particular four bar mechanism when "safety" or "stability" are primary concerns. It is interesting to note that both a and B stability are permanently built into a prosthesis and do not require maintenance or adjustment as is typical of single axis safety knees, a and B stability are also independent of any extension aids, hydraulic mechanism, etc.

(WARNING: a and B stability are features of only certain four bar mechanisms which were originally designed for stability. Some four bar mechanisms may be designed for cosmetic or swing phase characteristics and therefore may have poor values of a and B stability.)

SHORTENING OF A FOUR BAR KNEE PROSTHESIS DURING SWING PHASE

With the standard single axis knee prosthesis a typical problem encountered is that of foot to floor clearance during swing phase. It is sometimes necessary to shorten the prosthesis excessively to provide floor clearance during swing phase. Certain four bar knees, however, actually shorten as they pass from full extension to flexion. This feature allows fabrication of a "full length" prosthesis which automatically "shortens" during swing phase, similar to the actual human knee joint.

Fig. 3A depicts a four bar knee at full extension. The thigh length is "Alt" and the shin length is "B^" The overall prosthesis length is "O" as follows: Equation 3.

In Fig. 3B the mechanism is in the 65° flexion position,* which is generally accepted as the "mid swing" position. The value of A2 + B2 or C2 has now decreased and therefore results in additional foot to floor clearance. The amount of overall shortening is defined as the "L" value:

L = C1 - C2 (at 65° flexion)

L values for common four bar knee mechanisms are given in Table 1.

ACCELERATION/ DECELERATION OF A FOUR BAR LINKAGE KNEE DURING SWING PHASE

Precise kinematic and dynamic studies of four bar knee units can be extremely complex. Therefore, this paper will not attempt to analyze the complex motion of these mechanisms by any quantitative means. In lieu of a detailed analysis, a general qualitative examination will be presented.

Basic single axis knees with mechanical friction and spring assisted extension are essentially "linear" in their response during swing phase. The term "linear" applies a "constant" or "constant rate of change" of some property of the system. The mechanical friction is constant regardless of knee position or velocity. The spring assisted extension assist constantly increases (approximately) as knee flexion increases. The extension assist is also independent of knee velocity. Both of these features are adjustable to allow "tuning" or the swing phase characteristics of "heel rise" at "toe off" and impact at full extension.

Often it is impossible to suit a particular patient's gait pattern by tuning a basic single axis knee. Adjustment of friction or extension may cure one problem only to create another. Although both heel rise and terminal impact may finally be adjusted to prosthetic tolerances, the result may be a system that requires excessive effort by the patient. In this case, the patient often insists that the system be adjusted to suit his requirements for ease of flexion at the sacrifice of smooth operation.

Four bar knees are nonlinear in their operation. As the position of the shin changes, acceleration (deceleration) vary relative to position. This variance can be nonlinear depending on the design of the four bar mechanism. Therefore, it is possible to design a knee with motion characteristics similar to normal human knee motion. For example, certain four bar knee designs have built-in terminal deceleration which requires no use of mechanical friction or other devices.

To understand the acceleration-deceleration of a four bar mechanism the shin can be compared to the pendulum of a pendulum clock. By lowering the weight on the pendulum, the effective pendulum moment arm is lengthened. This adjustment slows the pendulum movement. Raising the weight conversely increases the speed of the pendulum. In the four bar knee the "pendulum moment arm" is increased as the instant center moves proximally during flexion. This action slows the shin movement and causes the deceleration phenomenon. Conversely, as the instant center moves distally, the shin accelerates.

As stated above, the precise quantitative analysis of a four bar motion is very difficult. However, the prosthetist can observe the operation of these knees and then make certain qualitative judgments regarding the swing phase characteristics of a particular mechanism. Terminal deceleration and response time (from "toe off" to full extension) are two characteristics which are very easy to observe. These observations can be made by either manually swinging the knee mechanism or by actual testing on a patient.

It should be noted that hydraulic and pneumatic knee mechanisms are also considered "nonlinear" in their operation. However, this nonlinearlity is not the same as that of a four bar mechanism. Hydraulic and pneumatic knees respond nonlinearily to different velocities of operation. This is not the case with four bar mechanisms. Four bar mechanisms are nonlinear with respect to shin position; not velocity. If a four bar mechanism is desired which automatically adjusts to varied gait speed, that mechanism must incorporate a hydraulic or pneumatic unit.

ADVANTAGES OF A FOUR BAR KNEE IN THE SITTING POSITION

General case—A sitting advantage of a four bar knee is the effective shortening of the shin as it passes into flexion. This feature was noted above as a swimg phase benefit of a four bar prosthesis which simulated the motion of the actual human knee joint. This advantage also gives the unilateral above knee amputee the visual appearance of legs with matching knee heights when sitting.

For tall amputees, an excessively long shin can cause clearance problems when sitting at desks or tables. In addition, when sitting on low chairs the tall amputee is forced into an uncomfortable position of excessive hip flexion. The four bar knee reduce both of these problems by the shortening action of the shin when sitting.

The "L" value was defined above at 65° knee flexion to provide a comparative method of analyzing shortening of a prosthesis. If the same calculation is made at 90° of knee flexion, the value obatined would be the effective shortening of the prosthetic shin when sitting. This value is defined as the "S" value. S values for common four bar knees are listed in Table 1.

S = C1 - C2 (at 90° flexion)
(see Fig. 3A and Fig. 3B )

Special Case-Knee Disarticulation—Conventional single axis knees present a particular cosmetic problem when fitting long above knee or knee disarticulation amputations. With these amputations, it is impossible to fabricate a prosthesis with a knee center at the anatomical height unless outside joints are used. However, outside joints have no friction adjustment, are not durable, and increase knee width. The distal end of the socket can only be placed wihin 1/2 to 2 1/4 inches proximal (depending on the particular knee mechanism) to the knee bolt center when a conventional above knee joint is used. In the case of knee disarticulation this could require lowering the prosthetic knee center approximately 2 to 4 inches below the anatomical (cosmetic) knee center, resulting in an excessively long thigh and short shin components. This condition is cosmetically unsightly when sitting and causes clearance difficulties when sitting in confined areas such as the rear seat of small automobiles.

With certain four bar knee designs it is possible to place the distal end of the socket at a level distal to the cosmetic (anatomical) knee center. A simple method of quantitatively evaluating this property of "cosmetic advantage" for a four bar knee is presented in Fig. 4A and Fig. 4B .

Fig. 4A is a schematic of an endoskeletal four bar knee mechanism that has been designed to have the aforementioned "cosmetic advantage." The point D is the most distal position at which the socket can possibly be placed along the T.A. line. With the knee mechanism fully extended, the T.A. line is noted on both the shin and thigh. The point D is also noted. The knee mechanism is then flexed 90° as seen in Fig. 4B . The point at which the shin T.A. line and the thigh T.A. line intersected is noted and defined as point "C." Finally, the distance from point C to point D is measured and this value is defined as "K" or the "K factor." If the point D is distal to the point C, the K factor is positive. If the converse is true, the K factor is negative. A positive K factor indicates a "cosmetic advantage" over single axis systems (Note: C is the "Cosmetic Knee Center").

All single axis knee shin units have negative K factor values ranging approximately from minus 1/2 to minus 2 1/2 inches. Outside joints, however, have a positive K factor value that can be as large as necessary.

Table 1 lists K factors for the most common four bar linkage knees. Those knees with a positive K factor would give the best cosmetic knee center for knee disarticulation amputations. Those knees with negative K factors would tend to be undesirable cosmetically for knee disarticulation amputations.

Positive K factors and L values are not the only property affecting true cosmetic analysis of a four bar knee. Each mechanism must be judged by the individual prosthetist to determine the ease of finishing or the general appearance of the finished prosthesis. Certain four bar mechanisms may have positive K factors but may be difficult to finish-fabricate with an acceptable cosmetic appearance.

ENERGY CONSUMPTION WITH FOUR BAR KNEE MECHANISMS

The amputee consumes energy during ambulation through muscular activity. This muscular activity develops the forces necessary for ambulation. It is the goal of the prosthetist to eliminate unproductive forces and minimize the productive forces required of the patient. This results in a proportional decrease in the energy loss of the patient during ambulation.

It was shown above that a and B stability reduce the force required from the patient to maintain extension during the early part of stance phase. This force reduction results in a directly proportional energy savings and therefore, a and B give a relative means of evaluating this energy loss.

It was noted that the four bar knee prosthesis can shorten as it passes from extension to flexion. This feature eliminates energy losses due to gait defects such as "hip hiking," "vaulting," "circumducting," etc. This feature also eliminates the need for excessive shortening of the prosthesis. The amount of prosthetic shortening causes a directly proportional energy loss. Moving the patient's mass center up and down during each full cycle of gait is the source of this loss. Therefore, the L value gives a relative means of analyzing the reduction of this particular energy loss.

The special acceleration-deceleration properties of certain four bar mechanisms also contribute to energy savings. The efficient operation afforded by these knees reduces the need for mechanical friction. Since mechanical friction is an energy consuming phenomenon, this furnished an additional means of energy conservation for certain four bar knees.

Finally, the acceleration and deceleration of a four bar knee are relative to knee position. In effect, these properties are perfectly timed controls occuring only at the position at which they are required. The precision and efficiency thus provided can also serve as a source of energy savings.

CONCLUSION

Four bar knee mechanisms can provide the prosthetist with a selection of knee characteristics which were previously unavailable with a single axis knees. The prosthetist should, through simple analysis of any four bar mechanism, be able to define the unique qualities or advantages of that knee mechanism. With this skill the prosthetist can confidently select a four bar knee to meet the specific needs of an individual prosthetic patient.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author wishes to express appreciation to Barbara Welsch for editorial and clerical assistance in preparation of this manuscript, to Steven Ohmer for his excellent graphics, and to William Svetz, C P.O for technical assistance.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hinkle, R.T., Konematics of Machines, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N J .

Muhbauer, K.C., Statics— an Individual Approach, Addison-Wesley— Publishing Company, Reading, Mass.,

* Page 178 Northwestern University Above Knee Prosthetic Manual


Lower Limb Prostheses - Policy Article (A) - CMS

NON-MEDICAL NECESSITY COVERAGE AND PAYMENT RULES

For any item to be covered by Medicare, it must 1) be eligible for a defined Medicare benefit category, 2) be reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member, and 3) meet all other applicable Medicare statutory and regulatory requirements. Information provided in this policy article relates to determinations other than those based on Social Security Act §(a)(1)(A) provisions (i.e. “reasonable and necessary”).

Lower limb prostheses are covered under the Medicare Artificial Legs, Arms and Eyes benefit (Social Security Act §(s)(9)). In order for a beneficiary's lower limb prosthesis to be eligible for reimbursement, the reasonable and necessary (R&N) requirements set out in the related Local Coverage Determination must be met. In addition to meeting the benefit policy, there are specific statutory payment policy requirements, discussed below, that also must be met.

GENERAL:

A repair is a restoration of the prosthesis to correct problems due to wear or damage.

An adjustment is any modification to the prosthesis due to a change in the beneficiary's condition or to improve the function of the prosthesis.

The following items are included in the reimbursement for a prosthesis and, therefore, are not separately billable to Medicare under the prosthetic benefit:

  • Evaluation of the residual limb and gait

  • Fitting of the prosthesis

  • Cost of base component parts and labor contained in HCPCS base codes

  • Repairs due to normal wear or tear within 90 days of delivery

  • Adjustments of the prosthesis or the prosthetic component made when fitting the prosthesis or component and for 90 days from the date of delivery when the adjustments are not necessitated by changes in the residual limb or the beneficiary's functional abilities.

Payment for Prostheses Provided During a Medicare Part A Covered Hospital Stay

Payment by Medicare Part A for a prosthesis provided to a beneficiary for use during a Medicare Part A covered hospital stay is eligible for inclusion in the payment for the hospital stay if the following criteria (1 and 2) are met:

  1. The prosthesis is provided to a beneficiary during the inpatient hospital stay; and,

  2. The beneficiary uses the prosthesis for reasonable and necessary inpatient treatment or rehabilitation.

In this situation, a claim must not be submitted to the DME MAC.

Payment by the DME MAC for a prosthesis delivered to a beneficiary, not for use during a Medicare Part A covered hospital stay, is eligible for DME MAC coverage if the following criteria (1 – 3) are met:

  1. The prosthesis is reasonable and necessary for a beneficiary after discharge from a hospital; and,

  2. The prosthesis is delivered to the beneficiary no more than two days prior to discharge to home; and,

  3. The prosthesis is not used for inpatient treatment or rehabilitation.

Payment for Prostheses Provided During a Medicare Part A Covered Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Stay

Payment by Medicare Part A for a prosthesis provided to a beneficiary, described by codes L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, and L, for use during a Medicare Part A covered SNF stay is eligible for inclusion in the payment for the SNF stay if the following criteria (1 and 2) are met:

  1. The prosthesis is provided to a beneficiary during the SNF stay; and,

  2. The beneficiary uses the prosthesis for reasonable and necessary treatment or rehabilitation.

In this situation, a claim must not be submitted to the DME MAC.

Claims (other than for the above HCPCS codes) for a lower limb prosthesis provided to a beneficiary during a Medicare Part A covered SNF stay (see below), and claims for any lower limb prosthesis provided to a beneficiary during a non-covered Medicare Part A SNF stay, are to be submitted to the DME MAC.

Payment by the DME MAC for a prosthesis delivered to a beneficiary during a Part A covered SNF stay is eligible for DME MAC coverage if:

  1. The prosthesis is reasonable and necessary for a beneficiary’s use during the Medicare Part A covered SNF stay; and,

  2. The prosthetic components are classified as major category III codes under the SNFs consolidated billing.


ADJUSTMENTS, REPAIRS, AND COMPONENT REPLACEMENT:

Routine periodic servicing, such as testing, cleaning, and checking of the prosthesis is noncovered. Adjustments to a prosthesis required by wear or by a change in the beneficiary's condition are covered under the initial treating practitioner's order for the prosthesis for the life of the prosthesis.

Repairs to a prosthesis are covered when necessary to make the prosthesis functional. If the expense for repairs exceeds the estimated expense of purchasing another entire prosthesis, no payments can be made for the amount of the excess. Maintenance which may be necessitated by manufacturer's recommendations or the construction of the prosthesis and must be performed by the prosthetist is covered as a repair.

Replacement of a prosthesis or prosthetic component is covered if the treating practitioner orders a replacement device or part because of any of the following:

  1. A change in the physiological condition of the beneficiary; or

  2. Irreparable wear of the device or a part of the device; or

  3. The condition of the device, or part of the device, requires repairs and the cost of such repairs would be more than 60% of the cost of a replacement device, or of the part being replaced.

Replacement of a prosthesis or prosthetic components required because of loss or irreparable damage may be reimbursed without a practitioner's order when it is determined that the prosthesis as originally ordered still fills the beneficiary's medical needs.

MISCELLANEOUS:

A prosthetic donning sleeve (L) will be denied as noncovered.

REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC DMEPOS ITEMS PURSUANT TO Final Rule (84 Fed. Reg Vol 217)

Final Rule (84 Fed. Reg Vol 217) requires a face-to-face encounter and a Written Order Prior to Delivery (WOPD) for specified HCPCS codes. CMS and the DME MACs provide a list of the specified codes, which is periodically updated. The required Face-to-Face Encounter and Written Order Prior to Delivery List is available here.

Claims for the specified items subject to Final Rule (84 Fed. Reg Vol 217) that do not meet the face-to-face encounter and WOPD requirements specified in the LCD-related Standard Documentation Requirements Article (A) will be denied as not reasonable and necessary.

If a supplier delivers an item prior to receipt of a WOPD, it will be denied as not reasonable and necessary. If the WOPD is not obtained prior to delivery, payment will not be made for that item even if a WOPD is subsequently obtained by the supplier. If a similar item is subsequently provided by an unrelated supplier who has obtained a WOPD, it will be eligible for coverage.

FUNCTIONAL LEVEL CHARACTERISTICS (based on CMS Health Technology Assessment: Lower Limb Prosthetic Workgroup Consensus Document, )

Note: Not all traits listed for K levels must be realized by the patient in order to receive a K level assignment, but generally, documentation should demonstrate that equivalent activities can be achieved by the prosthetic user.

Level 0: Does not have the ability or potential to ambulate or transfer safely with or without assistance and a prosthesis does not enhance their quality of life or mobility.

  1. The individual does not have sufficient cognitive ability to safely use a prosthesis with or without assistance.
  2. The individual requires assistance from equipment or a caregiver in order to transfer and use of a prosthesis does not improve mobility or independence with transfers.
  3. The individual is wheelchair dependent for mobility and use of a prosthesis does not improve transfer abilities.
  4. The individual is bedridden and has no need or capacity to ambulate or transfer.

Level 1: Has the ability or potential to use a prosthesis for transfers or ambulation on level surfaces at fixed cadence, typical of the limited and unlimited household ambulator.

  1. The individual has sufficient cognitive ability to safely use a prosthesis with or without an assistive device and/or the assistance/supervision of one person.
  2. The individual is capable of safe but limited ambulation within the home or on a similar flat surface like a home, with or without an assistive device and/or with or without the assistance/supervision of one person.
  3. The individual requires the use of a wheelchair for most activities outside of their residence.
  4. The individual is not capable of most of the functional activities designated in Level 2.

Level 2: Has the ability or potential for ambulation with the ability to transverse low level environmental barriers such as curbs, stairs or uneven surfaces. This level is typical of the limited community ambulator.

  1. The individual can, with or without an assistive device (which may include one or two handrails) and/or with or without the assistance/supervision of one person:
    1. Perform the Level 1 tasks designated above
    2. Ambulate on a flat, smooth surface (e.g., concrete, asphalt) such as might be found outside the home. (e.g., porch, deck, patio garage, driveway)
    3. Negotiate a curb
    4. Access public or private transportation
    5. Negotiate 1-2 stairs
    6. Negotiate a ramp built to ADA specifications.
  2. The individual may require a wheelchair for distances that are beyond the perimeters of the yard/driveway, apartment building, etc.
  3. The individual is only able to increase their generally observed speed of walking for short distances or with great effort.
  4. The individual is generally not capable of accomplishing most of the tasks at Level 3 (or does so infrequently with great effort).

Level 3: Has the ability or potential for ambulation with variable cadence, typical of the community ambulator who has the ability to transverse most environmental barriers and may have vocational, therapeutic, or exercise activity that demands prosthetic utilization beyond simple locomotion.

  1. With or without an assistive device (which may include one or two handrails), the individual is independently capable (i.e. requires no personal assistance or supervision) of performing the Level 2 tasks above and can:
    1. Walk on terrain that varies in texture and level (e.g., grass, gravel, uneven concrete)
    2. Negotiate 3-7 consecutive stairs
    3. Walk up/down ramps built to ADA specifications
    4. Open and close doors
    5. Ambulate through a crowded area (e.g., grocery store, big box store, restaurant)
    6. Cross a controlled intersection within their community within the time limit provided (varies by location)
    7. Access public or private transportation
    8. Perform dual ambulation tasks (e.g. carry an item or meaningfully converse while ambulating)
  2. The individual does not perform the activities of Level 4.

Level 4: Has the ability or potential for prosthetic ambulation that exceeds the basic ambulation skills, exhibiting high impact, stress or energy levels typical of the prosthetic demands of the child, active adult, or athlete.

With or without an assistive device (which may include one or two handrails), this individual is independently capable (i.e. requires no personal assistance or supervision) of performing high impact domestic, vocational or recreational activities such as:

  1. Running
  2. Repetitive stair climbing
  3. Climbing of steep hills
  4. Being a caregiver for another individual
  5. Home maintenance (e.g. repairs, cleaning)


POLICY SPECIFIC DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS


In addition to policy specific documentation requirements, there are general documentation requirements that are applicable to all DMEPOS policies. These general requirements are located in the DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS section of the LCD.

Refer to the LCD-related Standard Documentation Requirements article, located at the bottom of this Policy Article under the Related Local Coverage Documents section for additional information regarding GENERAL DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS and the POLICY SPECIFIC DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS discussed below.

Based on Social Security Act §(h)(5), for purposes of determining the reasonableness and medical necessity of orthotics and prosthetics, documentation created by an orthotist or prosthetist shall be considered part of the individual’s medical record to support documentation created by the treating practitioner.

When submitting a prosthetic claim, the billed code for knee, foot, ankle and hip (HCPCS codes L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L) components must be submitted with modifiers K0 - K4, indicating the expected beneficiary functional level. This expectation of functional ability information must be clearly documented and retained in the prosthetist's records. The simple entry of a K modifier in those records is not sufficient. There must be information about the beneficiary’s history and current condition which supports the designation of the functional level by the prosthetist.

For L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L for beneficiaries whose functional level is 2, the medical records must include all of the following:

  1. Documentation of a clinical evaluation of the beneficiary’s potential functional abilities by a treating practitioner or the prosthetist which designates a functional level of 2 (If completed by a prosthetist, the treating practitioner's medical records must support the functional level assigned); and,
  2. Discussion of the beneficiary’s overall medical health and the rationale for selection of a fluid, pneumatic, or electronic/microprocessor-control addition to a prosthetic knee system. Taking into consideration potential safety concerns of the advanced knee technology, the following must be included (at minimum):
    1. Which functional health outcomes (e.g., fall reduction, injury prevention, lower energy expenditure) are expected to be improved with the selected knee; and,
    2. Specifically which activities of daily living (e.g., transferring, climbing stairs, grocery shopping, housekeeping, working) are expected to be improved with the use of the selected knee; and,
  3. Documentation to support that lower-level knee systems (e.g., knee systems which exclude use of fluid, pneumatic, or microprocessor) have been considered and ruled out, including the rationale for why a lower-level knee system would not be sufficient to meet the beneficiary's specific functional and medical needs.  

Additionally, for an electronic/microprocessor-controlled knee system (L, L, or L plus associated components) for beneficiaries whose functional level is 2, the medical record must also include:

  1. Documentation that the electronic/microprocessor knee is indicated for functional level 2 and has integrated technology that allows the knee to detect when the user trips or stumbles and can automatically adjust to stabilize the knee unit (e.g., stumble recovery); and,
  2. Documentation indicating the beneficiary is able to make use of a product that requires daily charging and has the capacity to understand and respond to error alerts and alarms indicating problems with the function of the unit.

For L, the medical records should describe the nature and extent of the comorbidity of the spine or the sound limb which is what is limiting this beneficiary to a household ambulator, and clearly document how this feature will enable the beneficiary to function as a community ambulator.

Refer to the Supplier Manual for more information on documentation requirements.

REPAIR/REPLACEMENT (BPM Ch 15, §120)

Adjustments and repairs of prostheses and prosthetic components are covered under the original order for the prosthetic device.

Medicare payment may be made for the replacement of prosthetic devices which are artificial limbs, or for the replacement of any part of such devices, without regard to continuous use or useful lifetime restrictions if a treating practitioner determines that the replacement device, or replacement part of such a device, is reasonable and necessary. Claims involving the replacement of a prosthesis or major component (foot, ankle, knee, socket) must be supported by a new treating practitioner's order and documentation supporting the reason for the replacement. The reason for replacement must be documented by the treating practitioner, either on the order or in the medical record, and must fall under one of the following:

  1. A change in the physiological condition of the patient resulting in the need for a replacement. Examples include but are not limited to, changes in beneficiary weight, changes in the residual limb, beneficiary functional need changes; or,

  2. An irreparable change in the condition of the device, or in a part of the device resulting in the need for a replacement; or,

  3. The condition of the device, or the part of the device, requires repairs and the cost of such repairs would be more than 60 percent of the cost of a replacement device, or, as the case may be, of the part being replaced.

The prosthetist must retain documentation of the prosthesis or prosthetic component replaced, the reason for replacement, and a description of the labor involved irrespective of the time since the prosthesis was provided to the beneficiary. This information must be available upon request. It is recognized that there are situations where the reason for replacement includes but is not limited to: changes in the residual limb; functional need changes; or irreparable damage or wear/tear due to excessive beneficiary weight or prosthetic demands of very active amputees.


CONTINUED MEDICAL NEED

For all DMEPOS items, the initial justification for medical need is established at the time the item(s) is first ordered, therefore, beneficiary medical records demonstrating that the item is reasonable and necessary are created just prior to, or at the time of, the creation of the initial prescription. Once initial medical need is established, unless continued coverage requirements are specified in the LCD, ongoing need for the lower limb prosthesis is assumed to be met. There is no requirement for further documentation of continued medical need as long as the beneficiary continues to meet the Artificial Legs, Arms and Eyes benefit.


MODIFIERS

GA, GY, GZ, KX, LT, and RT MODIFIERS:

Aosuo Medical are exported all over the world and different industries with quality first. Our belief is to provide our customers with more and better high value-added products. Let's create a better future together.

Suppliers must add the KX modifier to claim lines billed for lower limb prosthetics only if all of the coverage criteria in the “Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity” section in the related LCD have been met and evidence of such is retained in the supplier’s files and available to the DME MAC upon request.

If all of the criteria in the “Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity” section of the related LCD have not been met, the GA or GZ modifier must be added to the code. When there is an expectation of a medical necessity denial, suppliers must enter the GA modifier on the claim line if they have obtained a properly executed Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) or the GZ modifier if they have not obtained a valid ABN.

Prosthetic donning sleeves (L) are statutorily non-covered and must be billed with a GY modifier.

Claim lines billed without a KX, GA, GY, or GZ modifier will be rejected as missing information.

The right (RT) and left (LT) modifiers must be used with prosthesis codes. Effective for claims with dates of service (DOS) on or after 3/1/, when the same code for prostheses, sockets, or components for bilateral amputees are billed on the same date of service bill each item on two separate claim lines using the RT and LT modifiers and 1 unit of service (UOS) on each claim line. Do not use the RTLT modifier on the same claim line and billed with 2 UOS. Claim lines billed without the RT and/or LT modifiers, or with RTLT on the same claim line and 2 UOS, will be rejected as incorrect coding.


CODING GUIDELINES

Code L (LOWER EXTREMITY PROSTHESIS, NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) must not be used to bill for any features or functions included in the socket or addition codes. Use of L is incorrect coding (unbundling).


REPAIR AND LABOR CODING

Code L is used to bill for any "minor" materials (i.e., those without specific HCPCS codes) used to achieve the adjustment and/or repair.

Code L is used to bill for labor associated with adjustments and repairs that either do not involve replacement parts or that involve replacement parts billed with code L. Code L must not be billed for labor time involved in the replacement of parts that are billed with a specific HCPCS code. Labor is included in the allowance for those codes.

One unit of service of code L represents 15 minutes of labor time. Documentation must exist in the supplier's records indicating the specific adjustment and/or repair performed and the time involved. The time reported for L must only be for actual repair time. Time performing the following services (not all-inclusive) must not be billed using code L:

  • Evaluation to determine the need for a repair or adjustment or follow-up assessment

  • Evaluation of problems regarding the fit or function of the prosthesis

  • General beneficiary education or gait instruction

  • Programming of electronic componentry


SUSPENSION

Code L includes both the part of the suspension locking mechanism that is integrated into the prosthesis socket and the pin(s), lanyard, or other component which is attached to the socket insert. L does not include the socket insert itself. The socket inserts used in conjunction with a suspension locking mechanism are billed with codes L, L, L, or L, as appropriate. These codes include socket inserts with or without a distal umbrella adapter for attaching the pin or lanyard of the locking mechanism.

Codes L and L are for use only with the initial issue of a custom fabricated socket insert. Additional inserts (either custom fabricated or prefabricated) provided at the time of initial issue or replacement socket inserts are coded L and L, whichever is applicable.

Codes L and L describe a modification to a prosthetic socket that incorporates a suction valve in the design. The items described by these codes are not components of a suspension locking mechanism (L).

L describes a complete device that is an addition to a lower limb prosthesis. The primary function of the vacuum pump is to suspend the prosthetic limb. Additionally, products coded L provide residual limb volume management and moisture evacuation. The pump mechanism evacuates air and accumulated moisture between the limb and socket walls. The pump mechanism can be actuated by either external power and/or mechanical system(s).

L describes a complete device that is an addition to a lower limb prosthesis. The primary function of the vacuum pump is to suspend the prosthetic limb. It also provides residual limb volume management and moisture evacuation. The pump mechanism evacuates air and accumulated moisture between the limb and socket walls. The pump mechanism can be actuated by either external power and/or mechanical system(s). Products described by this code would have components built to withstand higher prosthetic limb forces than L.

Code L (GASKET OR SEAL, FOR USE WITH PROSTHETIC SOCKET INSERT, ANY TYPE, EACH) describes a stand-alone (i.e., not integrated into or a part of a prosthetic socket insert) sealing ring that is added to a socket insert to assist in providing or maintaining negative pressure for socket suspension. The ring creates a seal against the outer surface of the insert and against the inner wall of the socket. L is not intended for use with mechanical socket suspensions such as a pin-lock system. It may be made of any suitable material. L may be used with upper or lower extremity sockets. Unit of service (UOS) is 1 (one) item. This code is not to be used to bill for gaskets, seals, or other sealing materials that are included as part of an insert. Integrated seals are included in the code for the insert. Separate billing of integrated gaskets or seals as L is unbundling.


PROSTHETIC SYSTEMS

Prosthetic system codes should not be used when billing a replacement socket for an existing prosthesis.

Immediate Post Op

L, L, L, and L describe weight bearing rigid dressings that are immediate post-surgical or early fitting, which include the alignable system, suspension system and one cast change.

L and L describe non-weight bearing rigid dressings that are immediate post-surgical or early fitting.

Preparatory

L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, and L describe preparatory prosthetic limb systems.

L and L include a molded plaster socket, a pylon, and a SACH Foot.

L and L include a direct formed thermoplastic patient socket, a pylon, and a SACH foot.

L, L, and L include a molded thermoplastic prosthetic socket, a pylon, and a SACH foot.

L and L include an adjustable open-end prosthetic socket and a SACH foot.

L, L, and L include a molded laminated prosthetic socket, a pylon, and a SACH foot.

Initial

L and L describe prosthetic systems which are used during the initial stages of prosthetic limb use. Both codes include a direct formed plaster socket, a pylon, and a SACH foot.

Exoskeletal

L, L, L, L, L, L, L, and L describe exoskeleton prosthetic limb systems.

L includes a molded prosthetic socket and a SACH foot.

L includes a plastic molded socket, external knee joints, thigh lacer, and a SACH foot.

L and L include a knee disarticulation molded prosthetic socket, external knee joints, and a SACH foot.

L, L, L, and L include a molded prosthetic socket, exoskeletal single axis knee-shin system, and a SACH foot.

Endoskeletal

L, L, L, L, and L describe endoskeletal prosthetic systems.

L includes a molded prosthetic socket and a SACH Foot.

L, L, L, and L include a molded prosthetic socket, an endoskeletal single axis knee-shin system, and a SACH foot.


PROSTHETIC CONNECTORS

L describes a complete endoskeletal product that is used as an osseointegrated external limb prosthetic connection device. The product provides a standard connection between an osseointegrated implantable limb component and endoskeletal prosthetic components. L describes a complete device, and the use of additional codes would be considered incorrect coding (unbundling). The predicate product is the Axor II osseointegrated external prosthetic connection device manufactured by Integrum, S.E.


SOCKETS

Codes L, L, and L for ultra-light materials may only be used when materials such as carbon fiber, fiberglass, Kevlar, or other advanced composite lamination materials are used in the fabrication of a socket for an endoskeletal prosthesis. They are not used for ultralight materials used in other components of a prosthesis – e.g., knee/shin system, pylon, ankle, foot. For codes L, L, and L, the unit of service is per limb.

L describes a complete mechanical product used as an addition to current lower extremity prosthetic base socket and socket replacement codes. This system is a kit of components (reel, cable, or similar) incorporated into a custom-fabricated socket. The beneficiary can manually adjust their socket volume throughout the day, decrease or increase. The predicate product is the RevoFit manufactured by Click Medical.

Infinite Socket (LIM Innovations) is an open-socket design that has distinct below knee and above knee products. These sockets are custom-fabricated from a model of the patient's residual limb and utilize struts that extend from a base to an adjustable brim enclosing an inner shell to form the primary structure of the socket. The LIM Innovations socket is functionally equivalent to design features of current HCPCS codes. The correct combination of HCPCS codes for the Infinite Socket TT-S (below-knee socket) are L or L with the addition of L, L, and L. The correct combination of HCPCS codes for the Infinite Socket T/F (above-knee socket) are L or L with the addition of L, L, and L.

Replacements

L, L, L, and L describe prosthetic socket replacements.

L includes a below the knee molded prosthetic socket replacement.

L includes an above the knee or knee disarticulation molded prosthetic socket replacement with an attachment plate.

L includes a hip disarticulation molded prosthetic socket replacement and a hip joint.

L includes a symes molded prosthetic socket replacement.

The use of the prosthetic system codes with a replacement socket is incorrect coding (unbundling).


PROTECTIVE COVERS

Lower limb prosthetic covers (L, L, L, and L) are complete products and afford shape, protection and waterproofing for normal daily usage of the prosthesis. They offer sufficient protection and weatherproofing for beneficiaries who require lower limb prosthetics.

Protective outer surface covering systems (L, L, and L) are specialized covers intended to be worn over an existing prosthesis. They are used by a beneficiary who has special needs for protection against unusually harsh environmental situations where it is necessary to protect the lower limb prosthesis beyond the level of protection that is afforded by L, L, L, and L. They are not for cosmetic or convenience reasons, or for everyday usage in a typical environment. Protective outer surface coverings are different from the covering that is already reimbursed as part of L, L, L, and L.


FOOT COVERS

Foot covers are included in the codes for a prosthetic foot component and are not separately payable.


KNEES

With the exception of items described by specific HCPCS codes, there should be no separate billing and there is no separate payment for a component or feature of a microprocessor controlled knee, including but not limited to real time gait analysis, continuous gait assessment, or electronically controlled static stance regulator.

Addition codes for exoskeletal knee-shin systems (L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, and L) are considered an upgrade to the knee-shin system. The beneficiary may qualify for an upgraded knee-shin system depending on their assigned K-level modifier (K0-K4) and any additional coverage criteria that must be met, as referenced in the LCD. These HCPCS codes can fully describe a complete prosthetic knee-shin system commonly referred to as a “base knee code.” A single addition code can fully describe a complete knee-shin system and thus the use of two codes from the list would be considered incorrect coding (unbundling).

Addition codes for endoskeletal knee-shin systems (L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, and L) are considered an upgrade to the knee-shin system. The beneficiary may qualify for an upgraded knee-shin system based on their assigned K-Level modifier (K0-K4) and any additional coverage criteria that must be met, as referenced in the LCD. These HCPCS codes can fully describe a complete prosthetic knee-shin system commonly referred to as a “base knee code.” A single addition code can fully describe a complete knee-shin system and thus the use of two codes (L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, and L) would be considered incorrect coding (unbundling).

L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, and L are additional features and/or functions that do not describe a complete endoskeletal knee-shin system and must be used in combination with an L-code for a knee-shin system (L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, and L). The use of additional feature L-codes may also depend on the assigned K-Level modifier (K0-K4) and any additional coverage criteria that must be met, as referenced in the LCD.

L describes an endoskeletal product that is used as an addition to L-code Knee-Shin Systems for lower limb prosthesis construction. The product provides shock absorption during the initial stance phase of gait. It is designed to simulate the eccentric contraction of the quadriceps to reduce trauma on the residual limb. The predicate product is the Stance Flexion Feature, Adjustable manufactured by Endolite North America.

L refers to a feature of an endoskeletal knee component which is incorporated into the entire knee-shin system. The Hydraulic Stance Extension Dampening Feature restricts the prosthetic knee joint’s extension moment during the transition of mid to late stance phase of gait. The predicate products are the Otto Bock 3R60, 3C98 and 3C88 Hydraulic Knees.

L refers to a feature of an endoskeletal knee component which is incorporated into the entire knee-shin system. The microprocessor componentry with sensors, any type, provide automated adjustment for controlling the swing and stance phase of gait. This feature would be discernable from schematic drawings and user manual documentation. The documentation would provide details for all of the adjustments for the dynamic properties of this sub-system within the knee component. Adjustments could factor user characteristics such as the activity level, body weight, or gait preferences, among others. This adjustment feature is energized by an on-board rechargeable battery source. The code would include any external components needed to access the microprocessor for modification of the settings.

L refers to a feature of an endoskeletal knee component which is incorporated into the entire knee-shin system. The microprocessor componentry with sensors, any type, provide automated adjustment for controlling the swing phase of gait. The documentation would provide details for all of the adjustments for the dynamic properties of this sub-system within the knee component. Adjustments could factor user characteristics such as the activity level, body weight, or gait preferences, among others. This adjustment feature is energized by an on-board rechargeable battery source. The code would include any external components needed to access the microprocessor for modification of the settings.

L refers to a feature of an endoskeletal knee component which is incorporated into the entire knee-shin system. The microprocessor componentry with sensors, any type, provide automated adjustment for controlling the stance phase of gait. The documentation would provide details for all of the adjustments for the dynamic properties of this sub-system within the knee component. Adjustments could factor user characteristics such as the activity level, body weight, or gait preferences, among others. This adjustment feature is energized by an on-board rechargeable battery source. The code would include any external components needed to access the microprocessor for modification of the settings.

L describes an endoskeletal above the knee positioning device that allows 360 degrees of rotation and locks the endoskeletal prosthetic knee and foot system in a neutral position for ambulation. The predicate product is the Ottobock 4R57 Rotation Adapter.


ANKLE AND LOWER EXTREMITY MOTION UNITS

Codes L, L, L, L, L and L describe separate products which provide either a single motion or a combination of motions generally attributed to functional movement of the lower limb during ambulation. The use of these codes can be used to fully describe additional features or functions not found in the prosthetic foot system (L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L L, L and L).

L describes a product that is used as an addition to L-code foot systems for lower limb prosthesis construction. The product provides multiaxial motion in the coronal and sagittal plane from articulating components. At transition of stance phase to swing phase, the product will increase the ankle’s dorsiflexion angle and maintain it throughout swing phase. The product provides an accommodation of changing heel heights without the user’s input. The predicate product is the Rincoe R-Hab Ankle manufactured by R.G. Rincoe & Associates, Inc.

L describes an exoskeletal device that allows adjustable amount of vertical twisting motion between the foot and pelvis during ambulation. Motion of this product is separate from any similar incidental prosthetic foot/ankle motions.

L describes an endoskeletal device that allows an adjustable, or non-adjustable, amount of vertical twisting motion between the foot and pelvis during ambulation. Motion of this product is separate from any similar incidental prosthetic foot/ankle motions.

L describes an endoskeletal pylon device that provides simulated multiaxial ankle motion through a dynamic vertical shank separate from any similar incidental prosthetic foot motions. The predicate product is The Seattle Ankle manufactured by Seattle Medical Systems Group.

L describes a product that is used as an addition to L-code foot systems for lower limb prosthesis construction. The product provides multiaxial motion in all three planes of motion, sagittal, coronal, and transverse. This code does not describe the multiaxial motion achieved from the inherent flexibility of the prosthetic keel or a split keel/heel prosthetic foot design. The predicate product is a device that was manufactured by Medical Center Prosthetic, which is represented in the coding narrative by “MCP.”

Use of L, L, L or L is based on the beneficiary’s K-level modifier (K0-K4), as referenced in the LCD.

L describes an endoskeletal pylon device that allows vertical shock reduction between the foot and pelvis during ambulation. The vertical shock reducing pylon feature of L is a separate function from other products which use a piston/telescoping mechanism such as products described by L or L. The predicate product is the Total Shock that was manufactured by Century XXII International, Inc.


FEET

Addition codes for lower extremity prostheses, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L are considered an upgrade to the SACH foot. The beneficiary may qualify for an upgraded prosthetic foot based on their assigned K-level modifier (K0-K4) and any additional coverage criteria that must be met, as referenced in the LCD. A single addition code (L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L) can fully describe a complete foot and thus the use of more than one code would be considered incorrect coding (unbundling).

L, L, L, L, L, L, L are additional features and/or functions that do not describe a complete prosthetic foot and may be used in combination with L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, L, and L. The use of additional feature L-codes may also depend on the assigned K-Level modifier (K0-K4) and any additional coverage criteria that must be met, as referenced in the LCD.

L describes a product that can be used for either endoskeletal or exoskeletal lower limb construction. The Flex Foot has an energy storing J-shaped keel design. Heel component is attached onto the J-shaped keel section. The Flex Foot System’s J-shaped keel design extends proximally as a monolithic composite shank. Shank height is determined and modified by supplier to utilize the dynamics of the composite shank. L includes foot cover.

L describes a product that can be used for either endoskeletal or exoskeletal lower limb construction. The Flex Walk has an energy storing J-shaped keel design. Heel component is attached to the J-shaped keel section. The Flex Walk J-shaped keel design proximally terminates at a nonadjustable fixed height determined and modified by the prosthetic foot manufacturer. L includes foot cover.

L describes a product that can be used for either endoskeletal or exoskeletal lower limb construction. All components are integrated as a single product, i.e. not an assembly of separate products or components. The product has an energy storing J-shaped keel design. Heel component is attached onto the J-shaped keel section. Vertical loading pylon allows controlled motion for shock absorption. This code does not describe vertical loading or shock absorption achieved from the inherent flexibility of the J-shaped keel section. L includes foot cover.


PARTIAL FOOT AND TOE FILLER INSERTS

Codes L, L, and L describe products that are necessary for standing balance and toe off support in beneficiaries who are missing the forefoot or digits including the hallux (great toe) and who require the rigidity and support offered by these products, in order to achieve or maintain an effective gait.

L describes a shoe insert with a rigid longitudinal arch support that also incorporates material accommodating the void left by the missing digit(s) or forefoot. Additional soft material is added where contact is made with the residual limb or toes. These inserts are designed to provide standing balance and toe off support for improved gait. L is inclusive of variations in materials or combinations such as differing stiffnesses or Shore value.

L describes a partial foot device including a molded socket for the residual limb with a proximal height terminating at the ankle or extending proximally as needed to achieve appropriate support and function. L is inclusive of a rigid longitudinal arch support that also incorporates material accommodating the void left by the missing digit(s) or forefoot. Additional soft material is added where contact is made with the residual limb or toes. L devices are designed to provide standing balance and toe off support for improved gait. All closures are included, any type. L is inclusive of variations in materials or combinations such as differing stiffnesses or Shore value.

L describes a partial foot device including a molded socket for the residual limb with a proximal height terminating at or near the tibial tubercle to achieve appropriate support and function. L is inclusive of a rigid longitudinal arch support that also incorporates material accommodating the void left by the missing digit(s) or forefoot. Additional soft material is added where contact is made with the residual limb or toes. L devices are designed to provide standing balance and toe off support for improved gait. All closures are included, any type. L is inclusive of variations in materials or combinations such as differing stiffnesses or Shore value.


MICROPROCESSOR ANKLE FOOT SYSTEMS

With the exception of items described by specific HCPCS codes, there should be no separate billing and there is no separate payment for a component or feature of a microprocessor controlled foot, including but not limited to real time gait analysis, continuous gait assessment, or electronically controlled static stance regulator.

L describes an endoskeletal device with integrated energy storage and release foot and microprocessor ankle system. The integrated microprocessor is programmable along with sensors to optimize plantar and dorsiflexion angles for stance and swing phase. L includes foot cover, power source(s) and charger.

A microprocessor ankle-foot system with power assist (BiOM Ankle-Foot System by iWalk, Inc) is coded as the combination of L (ADDITION, ENDOSKELETAL ANKLE-FOOT OR ANKLE SYSTEM, POWER ASSIST, INCLUDES ANY TYPE MOTOR(S)) and L (ENDOSKELETAL ANKLE FOOT SYSTEM, MICROPROCESSOR CONTROLLED FEATURE, DORSIFLEXION AND/OR PLANTAR FLEXION CONTROL, INCLUDES POWER SOURCE).

Coding Batteries and Chargers Concurrently With a Powered Base Item

Powered base items are those that contain the power source (battery). At the time that a base item is billed, all necessary batteries and/or battery chargers are considered as included in the payment for the powered base item. There is no separate payment for batteries (L, L, and L) and/or battery chargers (L, L, and L) billed concurrently with a powered base item.

Payments for items listed in Column II are included in the payment for each Column I code. Claims for Column II items billed with the provision of a Column I item will be denied as unbundling.

Column I Column II Base codes with battery, charger and/or power included Batteries L L L L L L L L L Chargers L L L L

Suppliers should contact the DME PDAC contractor for guidance on the correct coding of these items.


CODING VERIFICATION REVIEW

The only products which may be billed using the following list of HCPCS codes are those for which a written coding verification review (CVR) has been made by the Pricing, Data Analysis, and Coding (PDAC) contractor and subsequently published on the Product Classification List (PCL). Information concerning the documentation that must be submitted to the PDAC for a CVR can be found on the PDAC web site or by contacting the PDAC. A PCL with products which have received a coding verification can be found on the PDAC web site. The effective date of the CVR is included for each code.

Effective for claims with dates of service on or after January 1, :
L

Effective for claims with dates of service on or after January 1, :
L, L, L, L, L, L

If a product is billed to Medicare using a HCPCS code that requires written CVR, but the product is not on the PCL for that particular HCPCS code, then the claim line will be denied as incorrect coding.

If you are looking for more details, kindly visit four-axis hydraulic knee.